Skip to main content
L1

XOPS Platform Positioning Document

Version 1.0 | January 2026

Executive Summary​

XOPS is NOT a Software Asset Management (SAM) tool.

XOPS is an autonomous operations platform that transforms enterprise IT from reactive management to proactive optimization through a multidimensional knowledge graph. Software lifecycle management is just one dimension we optimize—not the category we're in.

The Category Error: When prospects compare XOPS to Flexera, ServiceNow SAM, or Snow Software, they're making a fundamental category mistake. That's like comparing Tesla to a gas station because both involve cars.

The Death of Legacy SAM: Why 1990s Thinking Doesn't Work in 2026​

The SAM Category is Dying​

Software Asset Management emerged in the 1990s to solve a simple problem: counting licenses. The category was built on these assumptions:

  • Software runs on desktops you own
  • Licenses are perpetual and simple
  • Renewals happen annually
  • IT knows what everyone uses
  • A spreadsheet can model it all

Every single one of these assumptions is now false.

What's Wrong with Legacy SAM Tools​

Legacy SAM ThinkingWhy It Fails Today
Inventory-centricModern IT is about relationships, not records
Software-only viewCan't optimize what you can't see (people, devices, communications, workplace)
Reactive reportingGenerate reports humans must interpret and act on
Point-in-time auditsBy the time you finish the audit, data is stale
Database architectureCan't model complex interdependencies
Manual workflowsHumans as middleware between detection and action
Single-dimensionalSoftware divorced from people, devices, locations, usage

The Spreadsheet Fallacy​

Legacy SAM vendors essentially built fancy spreadsheets:

  • Rows = Software assets
  • Columns = Attributes (cost, vendor, license type)
  • Humans = The "intelligence" layer

This worked when:

  • Software inventory changed quarterly
  • License models were simple
  • IT controlled everything

This fails catastrophically when:

  • SaaS subscriptions change daily
  • Usage spans devices, locations, and personas
  • Shadow IT is the norm, not the exception
  • Optimization requires cross-dimensional intelligence

The XOPS Paradigm: Autonomous Operations Through Multidimensional Intelligence​

Foundation: Knowledge Graph, Not Database​

Why Graphs Beat Databases for Operations

Database ThinkingKnowledge Graph Thinking
Entity-centric: "User has license"Relationship-centric: "User + Device + Location + Role + Usage Pattern → Optimization opportunity"
Schema-rigid: Predefined tablesSchema-flexible: Relationships emerge from reality
Join-expensive: Performance degrades with complexityTraversal-native: Designed for connected queries
Query-driven: Ask questions you knowDiscovery-driven: Find patterns you don't know exist
Static snapshots: Data ages immediatelyDynamic context: Relationships evolve in real-time

Example: The "Unused Software" Question

Database approach (Legacy SAM):

SELECT software
FROM licenses
WHERE last_used_date < 90_days_ago

Result: List of software. Human must investigate why, decide action, execute manually.

Knowledge Graph approach (XOPS):

TRAVERSE:
  Software → License → User → Device → Location → Role → Team → Project
FIND:
  - User on leave (HR system)
  - Device decommissioned (MDM)
  - Role changed (HRIS)
  - Project completed (Project Management)
  - Alternative tool adopted (Usage telemetry)
EXECUTE:
  - Reallocate license to User X (Device Y, Location Z)
  - Notify manager of optimization
  - Update budget forecast

Result: Autonomous action with full contextual intelligence.

The Six Dimensions of Operations Intelligence​

XOPS doesn't just track software. We create a living, multidimensional model of your entire operations:

1. Software Dimension​

  • SaaS subscriptions, licenses, usage
  • Cloud infrastructure, APIs, integrations
  • Cost allocation, optimization opportunities

2. People Dimension​

  • Employees, contractors, lifecycle events
  • Roles, teams, departments, reporting structure
  • Onboarding, offboarding, role changes

3. Device Dimension​

  • Endpoints, mobile, IoT, peripherals
  • Health, security posture, compliance
  • Provisioning, lifecycle, retirement

4. Communications Dimension​

  • VoIP, mobile plans, collaboration tools
  • Usage patterns, cost optimization
  • Security, compliance, policy enforcement

5. Workplace Dimension​

  • Physical locations, office spaces
  • Hybrid work patterns, desk booking
  • Real estate optimization, environmental impact

6. Network Dimension​

  • Connectivity, bandwidth, latency
  • Security posture, access control
  • Performance optimization, incident detection

The Power of Multidimensional Relationships​

Scenario: User Sarah Chen hasn't used her Adobe Creative Cloud license in 60 days.

Legacy SAM says: "Unused license. Human, investigate."

XOPS knows:

  • Sarah's role changed 65 days ago (HRIS integration)
  • She moved from Design to Product Management (Org chart)
  • Her device is now a MacBook, not a Wacom workstation (MDM)
  • She's using Figma heavily (SaaS telemetry)
  • Her team has 3 other Creative Cloud licenses (Software dimension)
  • Two designers just joined and are waiting for licenses (HR onboarding)

XOPS does:

  • Reallocates Sarah's license to Designer A
  • Purchases 1 additional license for Designer B
  • Updates budget forecast for Product Management (−1 Adobe)
  • Updates budget forecast for Design (context-based growth)
  • Notifies Finance of net-zero cost change
  • Logs decision rationale in audit trail

Time to value:

  • Legacy SAM: 3 days (discovery → analyst investigation → approval → manual action)
  • XOPS: 3 minutes (autonomous detection → contextual reasoning → execution)

The Three Pillars That Make XOPS Work​

Pillar 1: Knowledge Graph Architecture​

What It Is: A graph database where entities (people, software, devices) are nodes, and relationships (uses, belongs_to, depends_on) are edges with properties.

Why It Matters:

  • Query complexity is constant: Finding "all software used by remote workers in EMEA" is just as fast as "show me all software"
  • Relationships are first-class citizens: Not joins, not foreign keys—actual semantic connections
  • Context is built-in: Every entity carries its relationship history
  • Inference is possible: Graph algorithms detect patterns humans can't see

Real-World Impact:

  • Legacy SAM: "Which users have Microsoft 365 E5?"
  • XOPS: "Which users have E5 but only use E3 features, could be downgraded without impacting productivity, and would save us $47/user/month based on their usage patterns, device types, and role requirements?"

Pillar 2: Cerebro Cognitive Functions​

Cerebro is XOPS's cognitive layer—the "brain" that sits on top of the knowledge graph.

Memory​

  • Episodic Memory: What happened, when, and why
    • "Last 3 times we optimized Zoom licenses, usage rebounded within 45 days"
  • Semantic Memory: What things mean in your context
    • "Engineering VPs count as Power Users for analytics tools"
  • Procedural Memory: How things should be done
    • "Always notify manager before reallocating Design tools"

Intelligence​

  • Pattern Recognition: Detects anomalies, trends, opportunities
    • "Mobile spend increases 23% every Q1 due to sales hiring"
  • Predictive Analytics: Forecasts future state
    • "Based on hiring plan, we'll exceed Slack licenses in 37 days"
  • Optimization Algorithms: Finds maximum efficiency
    • "Consolidating 4 project management tools saves $127K/year"

Reasoning​

  • Contextual Decision-Making: Applies policies with nuance
    • "Don't auto-cancel licenses for users on parental leave"
  • Causal Inference: Understands cause and effect
    • "VPN slowness caused 34% of employees to adopt personal Dropbox"
  • Autonomous Execution: Takes action without human intervention
    • "Reallocate, notify, update budget, log audit trail"

Pillar 3: Config-as-Code Behavioral Control​

The Problem with Workflow Tools: Traditional SAM tools make you click through GUIs to set up rules. Rules are opaque, hard to version, impossible to test.

The XOPS Approach: Define behaviors in code.

policies:
  software_optimization:
    - name: "Reclaim Unused Licenses"
      trigger:
        dimension: software
        condition: "license.unused_days > 60"
      intelligence:
        require_context:
          - user.employment_status
          - user.role_change_history
          - device.active_status
          - team.similar_software_usage
        exclude_if:
          - user.on_leave: true
          - license.type: "enterprise_core"
      action:
        steps:
          - analyze_reallocation_opportunities
          - notify_manager_for_approval
          - reallocate_on_approval
          - update_budget_forecast
        rollback_on_error: true
        audit_trail: mandatory

Benefits:

  • Version control: Track changes, roll back bad policies
  • Testing: Simulate policies before deploying to production
  • Collaboration: Dev, Ops, Finance all speak the same language
  • Transparency: Anyone can understand the logic
  • Portability: Policies move between environments

Autonomous Outcomes, Not Reports​

The Report Trap​

Legacy SAM vendors measure success by reports generated:

  • Software inventory report
  • License compliance report
  • Cost optimization report
  • Usage analytics report

The problem: Reports create work, they don't eliminate it. Someone must:

  1. Read the report
  2. Interpret the findings
  3. Decide what to do
  4. Get approval
  5. Execute manually
  6. Verify completion

Humans are middleware between detection and action.

The XOPS Model: Autonomous Outcomes​

XOPS measures success by outcomes achieved:

  • Licenses reallocated automatically
  • Budgets optimized without meetings
  • Compliance violations prevented, not detected
  • Onboarding completed instantly, not scheduled

Example Outcomes:

Legacy SAM DeliverableXOPS Autonomous Outcome
"Report: 47 unused Adobe licenses""Action: Reallocated 47 Adobe licenses, saved $31K/month, notified 12 managers, updated budget"
"Alert: Non-compliant software detected""Prevention: Blocked installation, suggested compliant alternative, auto-purchased license, notified user"
"Dashboard: Mobile costs up 18%""Optimization: Identified 23 users with wrong plans, switched plans, negotiated carrier discount, saved $4K/month"
"Weekly review meeting scheduled""Continuous intelligence: 24/7 monitoring, autonomous optimization, exception-only human engagement"

From Periodic Audits to Continuous Intelligence​

Legacy SAM Timeline:

  • Month 1: Plan audit
  • Month 2: Collect data
  • Month 3: Analyze findings
  • Month 4: Present recommendations
  • Month 5: Get approval
  • Month 6: Execute changes
  • Result: 6-month-old insights, 5 months of wasted opportunity

XOPS Timeline:

  • Minute 1: Detect opportunity
  • Minute 2: Gather context from knowledge graph
  • Minute 3: Apply reasoning with Cerebro
  • Minute 4: Execute autonomous action
  • Minute 5: Verify outcome, update forecasts
  • Result: Real-time optimization, zero opportunity waste

Competitive Differentiation: XOPS vs. Legacy SAM​

Head-to-Head Comparison​

CapabilityFlexera / ServiceNow SAM / SnowXOPS
ArchitectureRelational databaseKnowledge graph
Data ModelSingle-dimensional (software-only)Multidimensional (6 dimensions)
IntelligenceRules-based workflowsCerebro cognitive functions
Operation ModeReactive reportingAutonomous execution
Time to ValueDays to weeks (human middleware)Minutes (autonomous)
ConfigurationGUI-based, point-and-clickConfig-as-code (version-controlled)
Optimization ScopeSoftware licenses onlySoftware + People + Devices + Comms + Workplace + Network
Context AwarenessLimited to software metadataFull organizational context via graph
Audit ModelPeriodic (quarterly/annual)Continuous (real-time)
Action ModelGenerate reports → humans actDetect → reason → execute autonomously
Cost Savings10-15% (industry average)30-50% (multidimensional optimization)
LearningStatic rulesAdaptive intelligence (learns from outcomes)
Integration ComplexityHeavy lifting (APIs, exports, imports)Native connectors to 400+ systems

Why XOPS Wins: The Autonomous Advantage​

Legacy SAM is a 1990s category solving a 1990s problem: counting perpetual licenses on desktops.

XOPS is a 2026 platform solving a 2026 challenge: autonomous optimization of complex, distributed, cloud-first operations.

The Shift:

  • From: Software Asset Management
  • To: Autonomous Operations Intelligence

The Outcome:

  • From: "We track licenses"
  • To: "We optimize your entire operating environment"

Why SAM is Dying: The Category Collapse​

Market Forces Killing SAM​

  1. SaaS Eliminated the License Counting Problem

    • No more perpetual licenses to track
    • Vendors handle entitlement management
    • Usage-based pricing makes "compliance" obsolete

  2. Cloud Made Infrastructure Ephemeral

    • Servers spin up and down automatically
    • Traditional asset tracking can't keep up
    • FinOps is the new SAM (and it's not enough either)

  3. Hybrid Work Blurred the Boundaries

    • Personal devices, home networks, coworking spaces
    • IT doesn't control the environment anymore
    • "Asset" is a meaningless concept

  4. Shadow IT Became Official IT

    • Users adopt tools without asking permission
    • Business units have their own budgets
    • Centralized tracking is a fantasy

  5. Optimization Requires Context SAM Can't Provide

    • Is this license unused because the user quit? On vacation? Switched roles? Device broken?
    • SAM tools don't know—they just count installs

What's Replacing SAM​

Not: Better SAM tools

Instead: Platforms that operate autonomously across all dimensions of IT operations.

The future isn't "let's track software better." It's "let's eliminate the need for humans to manage infrastructure at all."

Customer Conversation Guide: Repositioning XOPS​

When Prospects Say: "We're looking at SAM tools like Flexera..."​

Don't Say: "We're better at SAM than Flexera."

Do Say:

"I understand why you'd start with SAM tools—everyone does. But here's the question: Are you trying to track licenses, or are you trying to optimize operations?

If you just need a spreadsheet of software, Flexera works. But if you want to:

  • Automatically reallocate licenses when people change roles
  • Prevent compliance issues before they happen
  • Optimize not just software but devices, mobile plans, workplace costs
  • Eliminate the human middleware between detection and action

...then you're not looking for a SAM tool. You're looking for an autonomous operations platform. That's what XOPS is."

The Qualification Questions​

Ask these to determine if the prospect is a fit:

  1. "How long does it take from 'detecting an unused license' to 'reallocating it'?"

    • If they say "days" or "weeks," they need XOPS
    • If they say "we don't reallocate," they definitely need XOPS

  2. "Can your current SAM tool tell you WHY a license is unused?"

    • Answer is always "no"—that's the knowledge graph advantage

  3. "How many systems do your IT Ops team manually stitch together to understand what's happening?"

    • HRIS + MDM + SaaS telemetry + Finance + Ticketing = the problem XOPS solves

  4. "What percentage of your IT operations could be autonomous if you had perfect context?"

    • Gets them thinking beyond reporting to outcomes

  5. "Are you managing IT, or is IT managing you?"

    • Philosophical but powerful—sets up the autonomous operations pitch

The XOPS Positioning Narrative​

Setup: "Software Asset Management was invented in the 1990s to count licenses on desktops. It's 2026. That category is obsolete."

Problem: "Today's challenge isn't tracking software—it's optimizing operations across software, people, devices, communications, workplace, and network. Legacy SAM tools can't see these dimensions, let alone optimize them."

Solution: "XOPS is an autonomous operations platform built on a multidimensional knowledge graph. We don't generate reports—we generate outcomes. Licenses reallocated. Costs optimized. Compliance enforced. All without human middleware."

Proof: "Our customers save 30-50% on total IT operating costs—not just software—because we optimize across all six dimensions. And they do it with 70% less manual work because XOPS acts autonomously."

Call to Action: "If you want a better spreadsheet, stick with SAM tools. If you want autonomous operations, let's talk about XOPS."

The XOPS Category: Autonomous Operations Intelligence​

Defining the New Category​

Category Name: Autonomous Operations Intelligence (AOI)

Category Definition: Platforms that use multidimensional knowledge graphs and cognitive reasoning to autonomously optimize enterprise operations across software, people, devices, communications, workplace, and network dimensions.

Category Characteristics:

  • Architecture: Knowledge graph, not database
  • Intelligence: Cognitive reasoning, not rule-based workflows
  • Mode: Autonomous execution, not human-driven
  • Scope: Multidimensional, not software-only
  • Outcome: Optimization, not reporting

Why XOPS Owns This Category​

  1. We invented the category (first-mover advantage)
  2. We have the only multidimensional knowledge graph (architectural moat)
  3. We have Cerebro (cognitive differentiation)
  4. We have Config-as-Code (developer-friendly)
  5. We have the customer proof points (30-50% savings, 70% less manual work)

Category Expansion Strategy​

Phase 1 (Current): Establish "Autonomous Operations" as the alternative to SAM Phase 2 (2026): Position SAM as a "legacy category" that's being replaced Phase 3 (2027): Make "AOI" a recognized analyst category (Gartner Magic Quadrant)

Objection Handling: Turning SAM Comparisons Into Category Education​

Objection 1: "But we need SAM for license compliance."​

Response: "Absolutely—compliance matters. But here's the question: Do you want to detect non-compliance after it happens, or prevent it before it happens?

Legacy SAM tools are detection engines. They tell you 'You're non-compliant' and you scramble to fix it.

XOPS is a prevention engine. When a user tries to install non-compliant software, we:

  • Block the installation
  • Suggest a compliant alternative
  • Auto-purchase the license if needed
  • Provision access instantly
  • Log everything for audit

You're never non-compliant because we operate autonomously to maintain compliance."

Objection 2: "XOPS sounds expensive compared to SAM tools."​

Response: "Let's talk about total cost of ownership. Legacy SAM tools have three costs:

  1. License cost: $X per user
  2. Integration cost: 6-12 months of implementation
  3. Human cost: Analysts to interpret reports and execute manually

With XOPS:

  1. Platform cost: $Y per user (yes, higher)
  2. Integration cost: 4-6 weeks (native connectors to 400+ systems)
  3. Human cost: 70% reduction (autonomous execution)

And: XOPS optimizes 6 dimensions (software, people, devices, comms, workplace, network), not just software. Customers save 30-50% on total IT operating costs.

So the question isn't 'Can you afford XOPS?' It's 'Can you afford NOT to optimize autonomously?'"

Objection 3: "We already have ServiceNow ITOM. Why do we need XOPS?"​

Response: "ServiceNow ITOM is fantastic at workflow orchestration—if you tell it what to do. But who tells ServiceNow what to do? Humans.

XOPS sits above ServiceNow. We:

  • Detect opportunities in the knowledge graph
  • Apply cognitive reasoning to decide the right action
  • Execute via ServiceNow (we integrate natively)
  • Verify outcomes and learn

Think of it this way:

  • ServiceNow ITOM: The hands (executes workflows)
  • XOPS: The brain (decides what workflows to run)

We make ServiceNow autonomous, not replace it."

Objection 4: "This sounds too automated. What if XOPS makes a mistake?"​

Response: "Great question—autonomy requires trust. Here's how we build it:

  1. Policy-driven: You define the rules (Config-as-Code). XOPS never acts outside your policies.
  2. Context-aware: Cerebro reasoning ensures we understand WHY before acting.
  3. Approval workflows: For sensitive actions, we can require human approval before execution.
  4. Rollback: Every action is reversible. If something goes wrong, we undo it.
  5. Audit trail: Complete transparency—you can see why XOPS did what it did.
  6. Learning: We start conservative and get more confident as you trust the outcomes.

Most customers start with 'autonomous detection, human approval' and graduate to 'fully autonomous' within 90 days once they see the quality of decisions."

Proof Points: How XOPS Customers Win​

Case Study 1: Global Financial Services Firm​

Challenge: Managing 47,000 employees, 23,000 contractors, 400+ SaaS applications, $180M IT budget

Legacy SAM Approach:

  • Quarterly software audits
  • 6-person SAM team
  • 14 days per audit cycle
  • Reactive license optimization

XOPS Outcome:

  • $43M annual savings (24% reduction in total IT operating costs)
  • SAM team reduced to 1 person (70% headcount reduction)
  • Real-time optimization (zero audit cycles)
  • Autonomous operations (87% of actions require zero human intervention)

Key Insight: "We stopped managing software and started optimizing operations."

Case Study 2: Hypergrowth SaaS Company​

Challenge: Growing 300% YoY, hiring 50 people per month, chaotic tool sprawl

Legacy SAM Approach:

  • Spreadsheet tracking
  • Manual onboarding/offboarding
  • Shadow IT rampant
  • No cost visibility

XOPS Outcome:

  • $8M saved in year 1 (consolidating 47 tools to 31)
  • Onboarding time: 6 days → 6 hours (autonomous provisioning)
  • Offboarding time: 3 days → 3 minutes (automatic access revocation)
  • Shadow IT visibility: 0% → 94% (knowledge graph discovers everything)

Key Insight: "XOPS scaled with us. Legacy SAM tools would have broken."

Case Study 3: Healthcare Provider Network​

Challenge: 120 locations, hybrid workforce, strict compliance requirements, complex device ecosystem

Legacy SAM Approach:

  • ServiceNow SAM
  • Compliance audits twice per year
  • Manual device tracking
  • Reactive security

XOPS Outcome:

  • Zero compliance violations in 18 months (autonomous prevention)
  • $12M saved on device lifecycle (predictive maintenance, optimized refresh cycles)
  • Mobile costs reduced 31% (plan optimization across 6 carriers)
  • Security incidents down 64% (proactive threat detection via knowledge graph)

Key Insight: "XOPS gave us operational intelligence we didn't know was possible."

The Bottom Line: Why XOPS is Not SAM​

SAM is About Software. XOPS is About Operations.​

DimensionSAM ToolsXOPS
What you manageSoftware licensesEntire operational environment
How you manage itReports + human actionAutonomous intelligence
What you optimizeLicense costsTotal IT operating costs
How you prove valueCompliance reportsDollars saved, time reclaimed
Who benefitsIT Asset ManagersCIO, CFO, IT Ops, Finance, HR
What categorySoftware Asset Management (dying)Autonomous Operations Intelligence (emerging)

The Strategic Choice​

If you want:

  • A better way to count software licenses
  • Compliance reports for auditors
  • A tool for the SAM team

Then: Choose a SAM tool (Flexera, Snow, ServiceNow SAM)

If you want:

  • To optimize operations autonomously
  • To reduce total IT costs by 30-50%
  • To eliminate human middleware
  • To operate at the speed of your business

Then: Choose XOPS—the autonomous operations platform.

Call to Action: Positioning XOPS in the Market​

For Sales Teams​

  1. Stop saying "We're a SAM tool" → Start saying "We're an autonomous operations platform"
  2. Stop competing on features → Start competing on category (SAM vs. AOI)
  3. Stop talking about software → Start talking about outcomes (costs saved, time reclaimed)
  4. Stop demoing dashboards → Start demoing autonomous actions

For Marketing Teams​

  1. Rebrand all materials → Remove "SAM" language, introduce "Autonomous Operations Intelligence"
  2. Create category content → "The Death of SAM," "The Rise of Autonomous Operations"
  3. Publish comparison guides → "Why Knowledge Graphs Beat Databases for Operations"
  4. Customer proof points → Case studies showing 30-50% savings across all dimensions

For Product Teams​

  1. Double down on knowledge graph → This is the architectural moat
  2. Expand Cerebro cognitive functions → Make reasoning more transparent
  3. Build more autonomous actions → Reduce "human in the loop" to exceptions only
  4. Improve Config-as-Code → Make policies even easier to define and test

For Customer Success Teams​

  1. Shift customer mindset → From "software tracking" to "operational optimization"
  2. Demonstrate multidimensional value → Show savings across all 6 dimensions
  3. Build trust in autonomy → Start conservative, graduate to full automation
  4. Measure outcomes, not usage → Dollars saved, hours reclaimed, actions executed

Conclusion: The Future is Autonomous​

Software Asset Management is a 1990s category solving a 1990s problem. In 2026, the problem isn't tracking software—it's optimizing operations autonomously.

XOPS is not a better SAM tool. XOPS is a different category entirely: Autonomous Operations Intelligence.

We use a multidimensional knowledge graph to model your entire operating environment. We use Cerebro cognitive functions to reason about optimization opportunities. We use Config-as-Code to define behavioral policies. And we execute autonomously—detecting, reasoning, and acting without human middleware.

The result: 30-50% reduction in total IT operating costs, 70% reduction in manual operational work, and continuous intelligence that operates at the speed of your business.

The choice: Do you want to manage software, or do you want to optimize operations?

If it's the latter, you need XOPS.

Document Owner: Product Marketing Last Updated: January 14, 2026 Next Review: Q2 2026

Questions or feedback? Contact the Product Marketing team.